In 2011, the AAP issued a new policy statement. To summarize, it says:
All infants and toddlers should ride in a rear-facing car safety seat (CSS) until they are 2 years of age OR until they reach the highest weight or height allowed by the manufacturer of their CSS.
This wording is duplicated in their frequently updated Information for Families at HealthyChildren.org. The basis of this recommendation is primarily one study that surveyed injury data for children 0 to 23 months of age. Despite some acknowledged limitations, the study has been a benchmark in promoting rear-facing for older kids and we all applaud the results.
Meanwhile the curriculum for certified child passenger safety technicians in the USA states, “A child should remain in a rear-facing car seat AS LONG AS POSSIBLE. The child should remain in a rear-facing car seat until he or she reaches the top height or weight limit allowed by the car seat manufacturer. Once a child outgrows a rear-facing only seat, they can transfer to a rear-facing convertible until they reach the maximum height or weight for that seat.”
Other agencies, like NHTSA, have similar wording, “Keep your child rear-facing as long as possible. It’s the best way to keep him or her safe. Your child should remain in a rear-facing car seat until he or she reaches the top height or weight limit allowed by your car seat’s manufacturer.” CarseatBlog does as well, and we encourage parents to keep their kids rear-facing to the limits of their convertible seat. Many of our Recommended Rear-Facing Carseats have sufficient rear-facing weight and/or height limits to keep the majority of children rear-facing until age 3 or 4, or even beyond in some cases.
Although the messages are similar, they use slightly different wording. They all fail to specifically address child restraint instructions that permit a child to be forward-facing after one year of age. What if your child outgrows your convertible carseat’s rear-facing limits before their second birthday? Most convertibles on the market today can fit children rear-facing until at least 24 months, with some exceptions. For example, the Combi Coccoro is a great seat that fits in small spaces. However, its short shell and relatively low rear-facing weight limit make it more likely that some toddlers may outgrow it rear-facing before 24 months. Its manual states, “Toddlers 20-33 lbs., over one year of age, and who are capable of sitting upright unassisted may be forward-facing. Toddlers 33 to 40 lbs. and up to 40 inches tall MUST be forward-facing.” Many other carseats also have one year and 20-22 pound minimum limits for forward-facing.
Witness the chart from NHTSA:
As you can see from the chart, it is not prohibited to have a child ride forward-facing after age 1. To my knowledge, no auto manufacturer or major traffic safety agency in USA or Canada prohibits using a carseat as permitted by its instruction manual. Provided that the child is correctly restrained within the limits stated on the labels or in the manual, their carseat will still be very effective in reducing injuries. There is no doubt, based on both crash physics and real world data, that rear-facing is safest for babies, toddlers and kids of all ages if an appropriate restraint system can be used. With that said, there is some misinformation on this topic that we’d like to address:
- The AAP policy statement and NHTSA Guidelines do NOT prohibit using a child restraint according to the owner’s manual instructions. Many convertible carseats still have minimum forward-facing limits as low as 1 year AND 20-22 pounds. While we don’t recommend forward-facing for any child younger than 24 months, we do recognize that it is acceptable to do so according to some instructions.
- The AAP policy statement and the NHTSA guidelines do NOT dictate rear-facing until a minimum of 3 years old or 4 years old. The AAP recommendation is to keep kids rear-facing until their second birthday as a minimum. If the parent owns a carseat that permits rear-facing longer, that is the safest option.
- Neither the AAP policy statement nor the NHTSA guidelines instruct parents to only purchase carseats that potentially allow a child to remain rear-facing until age 3 or 4.
- Nor do either statement tell parents to buy a new rear-facing convertible if their child outgrows their current convertible’s rear-facing limit before a certain age.
While rear-facing limits are certainly important, they are only one aspect of finding the “best” carseat. The “best” carseat is one that fits the child and vehicle properly, and is easy to use correctly on each and every trip. These factors are the critical ones for most parents when considering the purchase of a new carseat.
What does this all mean for parents and advocates? Stay tuned for Part II tomorrow!
Nice read!
A part of me wishes the chart would show the availability of rear facing to 4 years of age though, as there are seats on your market that will allow this.
Then again I guess that would be nitpicking hehe, at least your chart shows rear facing toddlers as an option, that’s a good step in the right direction. 😀
By law here all children can forward face at 9kg (20lb) no matter the age as long as they can sit unaided for 10 min. Or so they say, but when you buy the seat for a baby (that is forward facing) I have never heard them actually ask about the sitting unaided part, only how much they weigh…
Our new legislation, i-Size, at least makes it illegal to forward face before 15 months, but I wish they would have upped it, but again, a step in the right direction. They also have more focus of the benefits of rear facing.
Thank you for this article. The problem that I have had with the AAP wording is that I think it gets widely misinterpreted as recommending that children should be turned forward at 2. The message that ERF beyond that age is better is lost. Because of this blog, DD is still RF at 5, but I have received criticism for years from people who think I should have turned her forward. (In a particularly horrifying example, a woman once came up to my husband in a parking lot after seeing our RF seats and told him in so many words that we were going to kill our children because we had not turned them forward yet.) The AAP statement was revised in 2011 with the goal of moving the minimum age to turn forward from 1 to 2, and it seems that most people have gotten that message. I wonder, though, whether there is any talk of revising the AAP wording to include the message that RF longer is better. The AAP statement seems to have a lot more power with the general public than the NHTSA statement, probably because pediatricians tell parents the AAP statement. Changing the wording a little could do a lot to promote ERF.
In canada i am almost positive that the law is 1 year and 22 lbs and walking unassisted.
I’m looking forward to it as well, great job so far!
Looking forward to part II!