Safety Archive

Recaro ProSport Recall: What to Do for Owners


Recaro ProSportToday NHTSA issued a recall of the Recaro Prosport, following a non-compliance notice issued in April. We have more details about the performance related non-compliance issue in our earlier blog.  The details of the recall notice from NHTSA can be found here.  Affected are all 39,181 Recaro ProSport model #385 child restraints, manufactured from June 16, 2010, through January 31, 2013.  Recaro will notify registered owners and will provide, at no cost, a label to affix over the existing information label and a complete set of new instructions informing owners to discontinue use of the LATCH system when the weight of the child reaches 40 pounds. The campaign is expected to begin during August 2014. Owners may contact Recaro at 1-888-973-2276.

ProSport II and Performance Sport models are NOT affected, as we are told these newer models were introduced after a design change effective from February 1, 2013. The updated Performance Sport model continues to be one of our Recommended Carseats.

If you are a current ProSPORT owner, we suggest taking the following steps to ensure that your child is well protected in a crash until you receive an official recall notification/remedy from Recaro:

  • DO NOT use the lower LATCH anchors for installation above 40 pounds
  • DO read the instruction manual and labels that came with your ProSport (or any updated replacements sent by Recaro) and make sure you are installing it correctly and in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions
  • DO tether the seat at all times, Recaro now recommends that you ALWAYS use the top tether when using the ProSPORT with a 5-point harness*
  • DO install the seat with a lap/shoulder seatbelt if your child weighs more than 40 lbs.
  • DO register your seat with Recaro or update your registration information if you have moved since you first bought the seat.

* Previously Recaro USA limited top tether use to 52 pounds.  I have confirmed that, “There is an official change that allows tether use up to the maximum weight limits of the RECARO combination seat models unless there is a top tether load limit stated in the vehicle manual from the vehicle manufacturer. RECARO also recommends always using the top tether with a forward-facing seat using an internal harness, and this would be retroactive.”  Please contact Recaro USA for additional guidance on this issue.

Recaro USA makes the following statement:

Dear Valued RECARO ProSPORT Owner,

This notice is in accordance with the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act. RECARO Child Safety, LLC has determined that the RECARO ProSPORT child restraints manufactured from June 16th, 2010 to January 31st, 2013 fail to conform to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 571.213 Child Restraint Systems. Our records indicate that you have either submitted registration for, or contacted our customer service team, regarding a ProSPORT manufactured in this period.

The ProSPORT failed to meet required head excursion limits set forth by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) when tested with a 52 pound, 6-year old dummy and installed with a LATCH belt only, no top tether. Not using the top tether could result in an increased risk of head impact in the event of a crash and also contradicts the ProSPORT instruction manual that came with your child restraint.

In this repair kit, you will find a label, instructions on how to affix the label, and a new instruction manual to repair your child restraint. The label and instruction manual advise you not only to ALWAYS use the top tether when using the ProSPORT with a 5-point harness, but also to discontinue using the lower anchors/LATCH strap when your child reaches 40 pounds. The combined weight of your child and the ProSPORT should not exceed 65 pounds when using lower anchors, as newly required by NHTSA in the FMVSS 213 standard for seats manufactured after February 27th, 2014. Discontinuing the use of LATCH when your child reaches 40 pounds updates your older ProSPORT to the new 2014 FMVSS 213 standard, and eliminates the risk posed by installation with LATCH belt only, no tether

If you have any questions regarding the recall or this repair kit, please email or call our customer service team at 1-888-9RECARO.

If you would like to submit a complaint to the Administrator at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, you can reach them by mail at 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590, by phone at1-888-327-4236, or via the web at

RECARO Child Safety, LLC

Rear-Facing As Long As Possible: What Does It Mean? Part II


A continuation from Part I.

So what does “Rear-Facing As Long As Possible” mean for most parents today?

The answer is going to vary from one parent to the next but it’s important to ask yourself that question! What does rear-facing for as long as possible mean to YOU?


Here at CarseatBlog, we’re parents too and we all have older kids so we’ve been around this RF/FF block a few times. These are a few basic DOs and DON’Ts to help guide you:

1. DO transition to a rear-facing convertible seat once the infant seat is outgrown.

Rear-facing-only seats (aka infant seats or “buckets”) tend to be outgrown by 6-18 months depending on the model you have and the weight/size of your baby. If you start off with a rear-facing-only seat – don’t move your child into a forward-facing seat once the infant seat is outgrown. The next step is a convertible seat installed in the rear-facing position. Different convertible seats have different features and different weight and height limits. Make sure you educate yourself so you don’t wind up with buyers remorse down the road. Our list of Recommended Carseats is a great place to start researching.  

SR35 in 2008 Honda Civic

Time to move to a rear-facing convertible!

2. DO set goals for rear-facing. 

At a minimum, aim to keep your child rear-facing until at least their second birthday. Rear-facing is much safer for children 12-23 months and CarseatBlog fully endorses the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy on extended rear-facing. In some cases, thinking about rear-facing until age 3, 4 or 5 may be too much for a parent with a younger child to commit to – especially if extended rear-facing (ERF) is a foreign concept. Setting an attainable goal, like RF until 24 months, is a great place to start. Once your toddler reaches 24 months you can re-evaluate the situation and adjust your goals if you want to do that.  Evenflo Triumph ProComfort - RF Toddler

3. DO educate yourself on “Best Practice” and the protective benefits of rear-facing in a crash.

“Best Practice” is the gold standard of protection (while following the manufacturer instructions). It’s the safest way to transport a child based on their age, weight, height and developmental levels. Ideally, kids should remain rear-facing until they reach either the maximum weight limit or the maximum height limit of their convertible seat (whichever happens first). Many of the convertible carseats on the market today will accommodate kids rear-facing beyond 24 months but there are always exceptions for the biggest toddlers and/or smaller carseats with lower weight and/or height limits. Be aware that there is a good chance that whatever convertible seat you purchase will actually allow forward-facing after 1 year old as long as the FF weight minimum (usually 20 or 22 lbs.) is met but forward-facing before age 2 is NOT recommended if you can avoid it. See Why Rear-Facing is Better: Your RF Link Guide

Kecia's DS2 rear-facing at 3 years old and 33 lbs

4. DON’T pick a carseat based solely on rear-facing weight and height limits. Do your research!

The BEST carseat is the one that fits your vehicle (installs tightly), fits your child (is appropriate for their age/weight/height), and that you can use correctly on every single ride. And of course it needs to fit your wallet too. The best carseat is not necessarily the most expensive carseat you can (or can’t) afford. And it’s not necessarily the carseat with the highest weight and/or height limits on the market. Remember – what works best for *your* child in *your* vehicle might not be the best choice for your sister or your neighbor or your online friend, and that’s important. For example, a carseat that doesn’t install tightly in your vehicle or one where you can’t easily adjust the harness to be snug on your child is not safe. A convertible carseat that can accommodate your child rear-facing until age 5 but doesn’t fit rear-facing in your car is not going to be the best choice for you either.


So what does “Rear-Facing As Long As Possible” mean for advocates and certified child passenger safety technicians?

In the technician certification course, we learn that rear-facing carseats protect the vulnerable head, neck and spine in a frontal crash by distributing the forces of the crash across the entire head and body. “It is the shell of the rear-facing carseat that absorbs the forces of the crash.” We factually present this information to parents the way it was presented to us. By doing so, it informs and empowers the parent to make educated decisions for their children. The more accurate information they have about the research and available products, the better able they are to make an educated choice. Some carseats, like the Graco Size4Me 65, offer exceptional rear-facing height limits at around $150. The Chicco NextFit has a great balance of rear-facing height and weight limits and works well in small spaces, too. We recently posted a list of a few other super extended rear-facing models that have exceptional weight or height limits.

Weight and height limits are not the only important boundaries for techs. For example, to suggest that it is bad parenting or even dangerous to turn a child forward-facing when allowed by the owner’s manual usually crosses one such line. We also shouldn’t be telling parents to buy ONLY carseats with exceptionally high rear-facing limits. Many can’t afford some of these options, so we need to be sensitive to a parent’s preferences, intentions and budget. For example, telling them they have to buy an expensive new rear-facing carseat for a child that is already 2 or 3 years of age may not be appropriate, especially if it is out of their budget or difficult for them to install or use correctly.

Technicians and advocates do need to be aware of best practice to encourage parents to keep their kids as safe as possible. Equally important is to synthesize all the information and then convey it to caregivers in a manner that is both welcomed and understandable. It’s not only WHAT you teach a parent, but HOW you teach them that is critical to having them keep their child as safe as possible. Promoting Extended Rear-Facing is very admirable, but crossing the line to overzealous or antagonistic messages will only cause parents to dismiss our advice altogether, and that is contrary to all the advocacy work we have done in the last 10+ years!

Ten Years Ago: Rear-Facing at 3.5 years old in a Britax Wizard

Finally, we also recognize that smaller convertible carseats may still be a very good choice for many kids. A prime example? The Cosco Scenera. The $39 price tag at Walmart makes it accessible to millions of families and it has been a safe and highly regarded carseat for over a decade. There’s also the Britax Roundabout G4 at $144 that tends to be easier to install and use than average and fits well in smaller vehicles, too. The Evenflo SureRide is another budget-friendly model for around $99 that offers good rear-facing height and weight limits. All three were recently rated as “Best Buys” by a leading consumer magazine.

In addition to our Recommended Rear-Facing Carseats, be sure to see our Rear-Facing Link Guide and our commentary on Rear-Facing Until 2 Years Old.

Additionally, our Rear-Facing Convertible Space Comparison blog and our list of Rear-Facing Convertible Measurements, Height & Weight Limits can be very helpful resources if you are in the market for a new convertible.

Rear-Facing As Long As Possible: Mixed Messages. Part I


In 2011, the AAP issued a new policy statement. To summarize, it says:

All infants and toddlers should ride in a rear-facing car safety seat (CSS) until they are 2 years of age OR until they reach the highest weight or height allowed by the manufacturer of their CSS.

This wording is duplicated in their frequently updated Information for Families at The basis of this recommendation is primarily one study that surveyed injury data for children 0 to 23 months of age. Despite some acknowledged limitations, the study has been a benchmark in promoting rear-facing for older kids and we all applaud the results.

Meanwhile the curriculum for certified child passenger safety technicians in the USA states, A child should remain in a rear-facing car seat AS LONG AS POSSIBLE. The child should remain in a rear-facing car seat until he or she reaches the top height or weight limit allowed by the car seat manufacturer. Once a child outgrows a rear-facing only seat, they can transfer to a rear-facing convertible until they reach the maximum height or weight for that seat.”

Other agencies, like NHTSA, have similar wording, “Keep your child rear-facing as long as possible. It’s the best way to keep him or her safe. Your child should remain in a rear-facing car seat until he or she reaches the top height or weight limit allowed by your car seat’s manufacturer.”  CarseatBlog does as well, and we encourage parents to keep their kids rear-facing to the limits of their convertible seat. Many of our Recommended Rear-Facing Carseats have sufficient rear-facing weight and/or height limits to keep the majority of children rear-facing until age 3 or 4, or even beyond in some cases.

Evenflo Triumph ProComfort - RF Toddler

Although the messages are similar, they use slightly different wording. They all fail to specifically address child restraint instructions that permit a child to be forward-facing after one year of age. What if your child outgrows your convertible carseat’s rear-facing limits before their second birthday? Most convertibles on the market today can fit children rear-facing until at least 24 months, with some exceptions. For example, the Combi Coccoro is a great seat that fits in small spaces. However, its short shell and relatively low rear-facing weight limit make it more likely that some toddlers may outgrow it rear-facing before 24 months. Its manual states, Toddlers 20-33 lbs., over one year of age, and who are capable of sitting upright unassisted may be forward-facing. Toddlers 33 to 40 lbs. and up to 40 inches tall MUST  be forward-facing.”  Many other carseats also have one year and 20-22 pound minimum limits for forward-facing.

Witness the chart from NHTSA:

Image Courtesy of NHTSA (

As you can see from the chart, it is not prohibited to have a child ride forward-facing after age 1. To my knowledge, no auto manufacturer or major traffic safety agency in USA or Canada prohibits using a carseat as permitted by its instruction manual. Provided that the child is correctly restrained within the limits stated on the labels or in the manual, their carseat will still be very effective in reducing injuries. There is no doubt, based on both crash physics and real world data, that rear-facing is safest for babies, toddlers and kids of all ages if an appropriate restraint system can be used. With that said, there is some misinformation on this topic that we’d like to address:

  1.  The AAP policy statement and NHTSA Guidelines do NOT prohibit using a child restraint according to the owner’s manual instructions. Many convertible carseats still have minimum forward-facing limits as low as 1 year AND 20-22 pounds. While we don’t recommend forward-facing for any child younger than 24 months, we do recognize that it is acceptable to do so according to some instructions.
  2. The AAP policy statement and the NHTSA guidelines do NOT dictate rear-facing until a minimum of 3 years old or 4 years old. The AAP recommendation is to keep kids rear-facing until their second birthday as a minimum. If the parent owns a carseat that permits rear-facing longer, that is the safest option.
  3. Neither the AAP policy statement nor the NHTSA guidelines instruct parents to only purchase carseats that potentially allow a child to remain rear-facing until age 3 or 4.
  4. Nor do either statement tell parents to buy a new rear-facing convertible if their child outgrows their current convertible’s rear-facing limit before a certain age.

While rear-facing limits are certainly important, they are only one aspect of finding the “best” carseat. The “best” carseat is one that fits the child and vehicle properly, and is easy to use correctly on each and every trip.  These factors are the critical ones for most parents when considering the purchase of a new carseat.

What does this all mean for parents and advocates?  Stay tuned for Part II tomorrow!

Rear-Facing vs. Forward-Facing Risk of Fatal Injury?


We have a study about rear-facing in the USA. It’s a great paper. It was also a major factor in promoting policy to rear-face until age two as a minimum. One main conclusion: “Effectiveness estimates for Rear Facing Car Seats (93%) were found to be 15% higher than those for Forward Facing Car Seats (78%)” [in preventing injuries of ISS9+ severity*]. Very impressive.

The study has some admitted weaknesses, though. Small sample sizes for one. No quantification in terms of child’s age by month is another, combined with the data being limited to 23 months of age. Looking for data to find the exact benefit to rear-facing for a 12-month old child? Forget it. Due to the complexity of child passenger safety issues, the authors suggest that the, “findings cannot be analyzed in a vacuum.” Yet, many of us do. We throw out a five times safer mantra flippantly from its results, without having read the study or knowing when that number might even apply. All too often, that mantra seems to imply that 5x more kids die or suffer permanent injuries because they were not kept rear-facing as long as possible, something totally unsupported by the study.

Among the other drawbacks to this study, the data is now well over 10 years old. It studied crashes from 1988-2003, meaning the vehicles and carseats involved in those crashes were mostly less safe models from the 1980s and 1990s. Another drawback was limited information on misuse. Also worth noting, it mostly discussed the risk of injuries* rather than being limited to fatalities or even critical/permanent injuries. Suppose you are an astute parent or advocate who has properly restrained your 24-month old child in the back of a newer minivan, according to the owner’s manual of a convertible carseat from our Recommended Carseats list. You actually read the instructions and discovered that it allows them to be either rear or forward-facing at their age, weight and height. You’d like to know the difference in risk of your child being killed or permanently injured. Sorry, that “5x safer” number doesn’t apply. Nope, not at all. We simply have no published and peer-reviewed research from recent years to provide useful statistics like this.

Rear-facing beyond 23 months old in 2002: Cool then and now!

Maybe Sweden is the answer, they have the data, right? After all, they keep kids rear-facing until around 4-years old and report nearly no fatalities to children of that age. Unfortunately, the nearly complete lack of children who are forward-facing in a 5-point harness system in Sweden means they also don’t have comparative statistics. Also, their environment is very different from North America, from the level of education about transporting children safely to the age and types of vehicles and carseats that are in use. Plus, their population as a whole does not travel nearly as many millions of miles on the roads as we do in the USA. So, it is essentially impossible to make valid comparisons of injury or fatality rates that can be attributed only to rear-facing.

We simply don’t know exactly how much safer rear-facing is in terms of critical injuries and/or fatalities for a properly restrained child in newer vehicles and carseats. We also don’t know at what age that the advantage of rear-facing starts to decrease for properly restrained children.

So, what do we know?