<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Radian SUPER LATCH (SL) connectors from Sunshine Kids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carseatblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146</link>
	<description>The Official Car-Seat.Org Blog about Kids, Safety and Parenting - Car Seat Reviews, Tips, Advice and More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 12:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sunshine Kids Radian XT Review (with lots of pictures!)</title>
		<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146&#038;cpage=1#comment-8421</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunshine Kids Radian XT Review (with lots of pictures!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146#comment-8421</guid>
		<description>[...] review for the Sunshine Kids Radian XT (there is also a newer Radian XTSL that is similar, with an improved LATCH system).  The XT is the newest version of the Radian80 with enhanced Side Impact Protection.  This is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] review for the Sunshine Kids Radian XT (there is also a newer Radian XTSL that is similar, with an improved LATCH system).  The XT is the newest version of the Radian80 with enhanced Side Impact Protection.  This is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kecia</title>
		<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146&#038;cpage=1#comment-5146</link>
		<dc:creator>Kecia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146#comment-5146</guid>
		<description>FYI - this blog post has been updated to reflect SKJP&#039;s decision NOT to offer SuperLATCH retro-fit kits to consumers with post-9/2008 Radian80 &amp; XT models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI &#8211; this blog post has been updated to reflect SKJP&#8217;s decision NOT to offer SuperLATCH retro-fit kits to consumers with post-9/2008 Radian80 &#038; XT models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LATCH to 80 Pounds: Progress or Confusion?</title>
		<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146&#038;cpage=1#comment-5141</link>
		<dc:creator>LATCH to 80 Pounds: Progress or Confusion?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146#comment-5141</guid>
		<description>[...] is a huge problem that simply hasn&#8217;t been addressed by the industry or NHTSA.  Until now.  Sunshine Kids has released their new Super LATCH system.  Essentially, they&#8217;ve strengthened their LATCH system hardware, including the webbing (now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a huge problem that simply hasn&#8217;t been addressed by the industry or NHTSA.  Until now.  Sunshine Kids has released their new Super LATCH system.  Essentially, they&#8217;ve strengthened their LATCH system hardware, including the webbing (now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixels99</title>
		<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146&#038;cpage=1#comment-5075</link>
		<dc:creator>pixels99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146#comment-5075</guid>
		<description>Kecia and Wendy - I just read the FMVSS 225, which is the LATCH standard for vehicles. Both the LATCH manual and Sunshine Kids are correct about the dates for tougher pull test standards. There was a phase-in year for the new standard. For vehicles manufactured 9/1/04-9/1/05, approximately 90% of them had to meet the new standard, and the remainder could meet the old standard. Since we have no way of identifying which vehicles might have been in the 10% or the 90%, using 9/1/2005 guarantees that all vehicles will meet the new standard.

FMVSS 225, in case you want to dig through it yourself: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2008/octqtr/pdf/49cfr571.225.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kecia and Wendy &#8211; I just read the FMVSS 225, which is the LATCH standard for vehicles. Both the LATCH manual and Sunshine Kids are correct about the dates for tougher pull test standards. There was a phase-in year for the new standard. For vehicles manufactured 9/1/04-9/1/05, approximately 90% of them had to meet the new standard, and the remainder could meet the old standard. Since we have no way of identifying which vehicles might have been in the 10% or the 90%, using 9/1/2005 guarantees that all vehicles will meet the new standard.</p>
<p>FMVSS 225, in case you want to dig through it yourself: <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2008/octqtr/pdf/49cfr571.225.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2008/octqtr/pdf/49cfr571.225.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indie</title>
		<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146&#038;cpage=1#comment-5061</link>
		<dc:creator>Indie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146#comment-5061</guid>
		<description>This makes me want to kick and cry. My seat was manufactured in June 2008 and purchased in Aug 2008. I was so freaking close! So close....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes me want to kick and cry. My seat was manufactured in June 2008 and purchased in Aug 2008. I was so freaking close! So close&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estelle</title>
		<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146&#038;cpage=1#comment-5002</link>
		<dc:creator>estelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146#comment-5002</guid>
		<description>So why on earth would I need a new harness to RF to 45? The harness itself holds to 65/80 FF, which is a whooooole lot more than 45 RF. Weird. 

I don&#039;t want one, but it&#039;s... well, it&#039;s odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why on earth would I need a new harness to RF to 45? The harness itself holds to 65/80 FF, which is a whooooole lot more than 45 RF. Weird. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want one, but it&#8217;s&#8230; well, it&#8217;s odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murphydog77</title>
		<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146&#038;cpage=1#comment-4915</link>
		<dc:creator>murphydog77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146#comment-4915</guid>
		<description>The LATCH belt has a new tilt-lock mechanism on it instead of the push-button locking mechanism for tightening it.  It&#039;s a lot smoother to pull tight and harder for the LATCH belt to double-over on itself as you&#039;re pulling it tight.  The LATCH belt itself is also thicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LATCH belt has a new tilt-lock mechanism on it instead of the push-button locking mechanism for tightening it.  It&#8217;s a lot smoother to pull tight and harder for the LATCH belt to double-over on itself as you&#8217;re pulling it tight.  The LATCH belt itself is also thicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fyrfightermomma</title>
		<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146&#038;cpage=1#comment-4906</link>
		<dc:creator>fyrfightermomma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146#comment-4906</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused because the healthcheck website listed it as an &quot;easy pull&quot; system that lets you install the seat in less than 1 minute. Is there any &quot;new&quot; way to tighten it? If it&#039;s the same base and the same tighten mechanism, is really hasn&#039;t solved the install issues which is the big problem with these seats. I sure know in my two cars I can&#039;t install it in less than 1 minute! Please tell me they did SOMETHING to make the install easier other than upping the LATCH limit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused because the healthcheck website listed it as an &#8220;easy pull&#8221; system that lets you install the seat in less than 1 minute. Is there any &#8220;new&#8221; way to tighten it? If it&#8217;s the same base and the same tighten mechanism, is really hasn&#8217;t solved the install issues which is the big problem with these seats. I sure know in my two cars I can&#8217;t install it in less than 1 minute! Please tell me they did SOMETHING to make the install easier other than upping the LATCH limit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThreeBeans</title>
		<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146&#038;cpage=1#comment-4903</link>
		<dc:creator>ThreeBeans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146#comment-4903</guid>
		<description>Holy crap, that thing looks lethal.  I think it might bite me.  I&#039;m frightened.  Hold me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap, that thing looks lethal.  I think it might bite me.  I&#8217;m frightened.  Hold me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NannyMom</title>
		<link>http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146&#038;cpage=1#comment-4890</link>
		<dc:creator>NannyMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carseatblog.com/?p=4146#comment-4890</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess since the heaviest kid that might RF in my car is about 33 pounds, I&#039;m good with my 40 pound RF Radian 65.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess since the heaviest kid that might RF in my car is about 33 pounds, I&#8217;m good with my 40 pound RF Radian 65.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
